tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36647723.post7974218258579789623..comments2023-09-09T00:30:46.617-07:00Comments on Hearos (Insights) on Daf Yomi: מצות סירוסAvi Lebowitzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10757679478618591719noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36647723.post-66669904004077445852007-04-20T13:25:00.000-07:002007-04-20T13:25:00.000-07:00the word ברצכם usually comes to exclude חו"ל but h...the word ברצכם usually comes to exclude חו"ל but here the malbim (and i think its an open gemara in kidushin) say that it caanot because its a חובת הגוף therefor no ריבוי is needed still the sifra makes a ריבוי. <BR/>there is a concept that we do not bring בכור from חו"ל to erets yisroel (see mishnayos) but you are right that is why i also said i don't think it fully explains it.<BR/>thanks for your comment.Yossie Schonkopfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15939094862678918894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36647723.post-73115599868890989942007-04-20T13:13:00.000-07:002007-04-20T13:13:00.000-07:00i think that you are making an excellent point and...i think that you are making an excellent point and it would come out that based on rashi who says that the question is only by a dog, even though we conclude that the issur does apply, but it would not apply to a fish. clearly the minchas chinuch who raises the question was not learning the nature of the issur to be korbanos as you point out.<BR/>regarding chutz la'aretz, i don't think the relation to korbanos would explain the logic to limit it to eretz yisroel, since one can be makdish a korban in chutz la'aretz. it seems that the word "artzichem" indicates eretz yisroel.Avi Lebowitzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10757679478618591719noreply@blogger.com