Tuesday, October 28, 2008

kiddushin 21b - retziah for kohen

the braisa says that a kohen cant begome a nirtza because it will make him a baal mum. the gemara asks, so what if he turns into a ba'al mum. The gemara answers that he has to be ableto return back to his original status after he goes free which for a kohen includes able to do avoda. it seems that the gemaras original question is just 'so what if he becomesva baal mum' - is there any issurto make a kohen a bal mum. But rashi adds to the question that there is a mitzvah to do retzia. why does rashi need to adt this? rashi implies that for a kohen o make a mum without mitzva would surely be an issur, presumabely bec. he would be passul l'avoda (or maybe because of chovel b'atzmo). But since here is a mitzva, there isn't any issur mitzad hilchos mumin that would prohibit making a mum - so the gemara asks that he should be allowed to make a mum for mitzva. To this the gemara respondsthat there is a requirement in hilchos avodim that if he can't return to his original shteller then he can't be a nirtza.

2 comments:

isaac said...

I had the same reservations about Rashi. but I did not understand what Rash'i implies that the Retziah is a Mitzvah, especially if it's in regard to the eved who is a Cohen and could have avoided the situation by not insisting on staying on.

Avi Lebowitz said...

i think that rashi means that retzia is not being done for the purpose of making a mum, or for no purpose at all, which would be assur for a kohen to do. Rather it is part and parcel of the process of becoming an eved nirtzah. rashi calls this a "mitzvah" just as gett or chalitzah may be called a mitzvah - the point being it is a torah prescribed process to achieve a particular goal and therefore should not violate the prohibition of causing a mum for no rational reason.